Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoewy, Arnold H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-22T13:40:46Z
dc.date.available2014-05-22T13:40:46Z
dc.date.issued1963
dc.identifier.citation43 B.U. L. Rev. 386en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10601/1957
dc.description.abstractOn May 29, 1961, the Supreme Court in Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market, and three companion cases, sustained the constitutionality of the Massachusetts Sunday Closing Laws. In so doing, it rejected the claim that the laws unreasonably prohibited the free exercise of religion by not containing a blanket Sabbatarian exemption. Subsequent to Gallagher, several bills have been introduced in the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives which would exempt Sabbatarians from all of the Sunday prohibitions embodied in Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. Ch. 136, § 5. It is the purpose of this note to consider the constitutionality of such an exemption.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBoston University Law Review
dc.relation.urihttp://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/bulr43&collection=journals&index=journals/bulr392&id=392
dc.subjectFirst Amendmenten_US
dc.subjectEstablishment Clauseen_US
dc.subjectFree Exercise Clauseen_US
dc.subjectEqual protectionen_US
dc.subjectSeparation of church and stateen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional lawen_US
dc.titleThe Constitutionality of Sabbatarian Exemptionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record