Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirby, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-03T21:43:41Z
dc.date.available2010-04-03T21:43:41Z
dc.date.issued1971
dc.identifier.citation2 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 255en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10601/401
dc.description.abstractThe terms vagueness and overbreadth appear frequently in recent student rights cases, and the two ideas they symbolize are fundamentally important in the developing field of campus law. What follows is an examination of vagueness and overbreadth as applied to university rules. In this regard a distinction will, if possible, be made between their meanings, and the two separate bases of constitutional infirmity expressed by the two words will be identified and differentiated. The opinions in recent student rights cases will be examined to see which term the court has utilized in each, and which of the two infirmities furnished the theory for attacking the rule.en_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Review
dc.relation.urihttp://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/text2&collection=journals&id=265&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.subjectVagueness and overbreadthen_US
dc.subjectStudent rightsen_US
dc.subjectCampus lawen_US
dc.titleVagueness and Overbreadth in University Regulationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record