Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorResendez, Rodolfo Antonio
dc.date.available2011-02-18T22:43:58Z
dc.date.issued1989-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/18758en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the research study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of two delivery systems for drop-out prevention in the elementary school. The first program involved a self-contained, homogeneous classroom composed of fifth and sixth grade, at-risk, over-age students and known as the Program for Academic Skills and Self-Esteem (PASS). The other program designated. Program A, also involved fifth and sixth grade identified, at-risk and over-age students who were assigned to another campus and to nine, self-contained, heterogeneous fifth and sixth grade classes. The study was restricted to two elementary schools in the Ysleta Independent School District in El Paso, Texas, during the 1987-1989 scholastic years. It addressed the academic gain, the per-student cost of providing the program, and the relationships between the per-student cost and the students' gain in academic achievement in the two delivery systems. This study will assist school districts to plan and implement cost-effective educational programs within their designated budget allocations. It will also identify and assist with the drop-out problem. The procedures for the study were carried out in four phases. They included the identification of the alternative programs; the cost analysis; the effectiveness; and the comparison of cost-effectiveness of the two-program delivery systems. The major findings were that Program A was more cost-effective than the PASS Program. The t-test for independent samples indicated a significance between the cost-effectiveness ratios of the two delivery systems. The null hypothesis was rejected at the .05 level. The t-test indicated that there was not a significant difference in the mean per student achievement gain at the .05 level. However, there was a significant difference in the per student cost of the two delivery systems. The PASS Program had a mean per-student cost of $2191 while Program A was $1923. The PASS Program was the most expensive of the two delivery systems. The t-test indicated a significant difference in the mean per-student cost at the .05 level. The application of cost analysis within a school district context plays an important role in the accountability and creditability of the decision-making process. Cost-effectiveness techniques will assist administrators to make sound and more informed decisions.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTexas Tech Universityen_US
dc.subjectEducational evaluationen_US
dc.subjectElementary school dropouts -- Texas -- El Pasoen_US
dc.subjectElementary -- Texas -- El Pasoen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.titleThe cost-effectiveness of two program delivery systems for drop-out prevention in the elementary school
dc.typeDissertation
thesis.degree.nameEd.D.
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.grantorTexas Tech University
thesis.degree.departmentEducation
dc.rights.availabilityUnrestricted.


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem