• English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • français 
    • English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • Ouvrir une session
Voir le document 
  •   Accueil de TTU DSpace
  • ThinkTech
  • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
  • Voir le document
  •   Accueil de TTU DSpace
  • ThinkTech
  • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
  • Voir le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Cognitive behavior and active engaged time: The impact of the CASE curriculum

Thumbnail
Voir/Ouvrir
WITT-DISSERTATION.pdf (1.179Mo)
Date
2012-05
Auteur
Witt, Phillip
Metadata
Afficher la notice complète
Résumé
Teacher and student behavior in the classroom have both been linked to student achievement. The hands on, real world experiences which students are offered through career and technical education courses provide an opportunity for agricultural education to make contributions to student achievement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact the CASE curriculum has on the academic engagement of students enrolled in animal science courses and the cognitive behavior of agriculture teachers. The target population for this study consisted of secondary agriculture teachers who teach animal science courses and the students enrolled in those courses. The study employed a quasi-experimental, static-group comparison design. Nine CASE certified teachers represented the treatment group, which were matched with nine traditional agriculture teachers on selected criteria. Teachers’ cognitive behavior was measured using the Florida Taxonomy of Cognitive Behavior while student engagement was measured using the Behavioral Observation of Students in Schools. Matched-pairs t tests were used to compare the CASE group and the traditional group on cognitive behavior and student engagement. Students in the CASE group were found to spend significantly more time actively engaged that those in traditional agriculture courses. This difference represents a large practical difference as well. No significant differences were found between the two groups on the measures of teachers’ cognitive behavior. From the findings it was concluded that the CASE curriculum and professional development can impact the active engagement of students in the classroom and potentially affect student achievement.
Citable Link
http://hdl.handle.net/2346/45361
Collections
  • Electronic Theses and Dissertations

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contactez-nous
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Parcourir

Tout DSpaceCommunautés & CollectionsPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsDepartmentCette collectionPar date de publicationAuteursTitresSujetsDepartment

Mon compte

Ouvrir une sessionS'inscrire

Statistiques

Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contactez-nous
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV