Show simple item record

dc.creatorBeal, Ron
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-27T18:01:27Z
dc.date.available2017-10-27T18:01:27Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citation2 Tex. Tech J. Tex. Admin. L. 209en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/73311
dc.description.abstractFocuses on the powers of an administrative law judge (ALJ) as granted by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The author explains that an ALJ has all power analogous to those of a district court judge when issuing a final order in a bench trial. The job of an ALJ entails more than basic fact finding. ALJs have a duty to determine the meaning and applicability of the law and to issue proposals for decisions that can withstand judicial scrutiny. The author notes that the APA and other relevant statutes intend the ALJ to stand in the shoes of the agency board or state officer and issue orders consistent with agency precedent.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Journal of Texas Administrative Lawen_US
dc.subjectAdministrative Law Judgeen_US
dc.subjectHearing officeren_US
dc.subjectALJen_US
dc.subjectAdministrative Procedure Acten_US
dc.subjectAPAen_US
dc.subjectJudicial poweren_US
dc.subjectFact findingen_US
dc.subjectTexasen_US
dc.titleIssuing a Proposal for Decision: An Analysis of the Power of an Administrative Law Judge in Rendering Proposed Findings in a Contested Case Proceedingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.noteOriginal journal title: Texas Tech Journal of Texas Administrative Law.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record