Show simple item record

dc.creatorKirby, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-30T15:59:29Z
dc.date.available2017-10-30T15:59:29Z
dc.date.issued1969
dc.identifier.citation1 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 111en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/73316
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the case of Humber v. Morton and whether builder-vendors of new housing impliedly warrant good workmanship and human habitability. The Texas Supreme Court held that builder-vendors do impliedly warrant good workmanship and habitability and that consumers may base a lawsuit on this theory. Further, this article analyzes the unanswered questions remaining after Humber v. Morton.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectImplied warranty of good workmanship and habitabilityen_US
dc.subjectHumber v. Mortonen_US
dc.subjectBuilder-vendoren_US
dc.subjectCaveat emptoren_US
dc.subjectDoctrine of mergeren_US
dc.subjectHabitabilityen_US
dc.subjectImplied warrantyen_US
dc.subjectTexasen_US
dc.titleBuilder-Vendor’s Implied Warranty of Good Workmanship and Habitabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record