Show simple item record

dc.creatorPark, Mari
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-01T15:43:16Z
dc.date.available2018-05-01T15:43:16Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationMari Park, The Parent Trap: Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America v. Pittas, How it Reinforced Filial Responsibility Laws and Whether Filial Responsibility Laws Can Really Make You Pay, 5 Est. Plan. & Cmty. Prop. L. J. 441 (2013).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/73616
dc.description.abstractAddresses filial responsibility laws and the various ways they may affect adult children who are unaware of such laws. First, a discussion of case law introduces a common situation in which children could be held liable for their parents' long-term care costs. Part II.B presents an overview of Pennsylvania's filial responsibility law as well as the history behind it. Part III addresses the twenty-eight other states with similar statutes and discuss the pros and cons of having and enforcing filial responsibility. Part IV focuses on Texas, which does not have a filial responsibility statute, and recommends that Texas should adopt a similar law.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Estate Planning & Community Property Journalen_US
dc.subjectFilial responsibilitiesen_US
dc.subjectPennsylvaniaen_US
dc.subjectTexasen_US
dc.subjectLong-term careen_US
dc.subjectParentsen_US
dc.subjectAdult childrenen_US
dc.subjectEstate planningen_US
dc.subjectLife planningen_US
dc.titleThe Parent Trap: Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America v. Pittas, How it Reinforced Filial Responsibility Laws and Whether Filial Responsibility Laws Can Really Make You Payen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record