Show simple item record

dc.creatorLoewy, Arnold
dc.creatorMoster, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-26T21:08:06Z
dc.date.available2018-07-26T21:08:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationArnold Loewy & Charles Moster, It’s Debatable: Should Justices Fit Litmus Test?, Lubbock Avalanche-Journal (Apr. 16, 2016).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/74311
dc.description.abstractArnold Loewy and Charles Moster debate whether a President should use a litmus test to choose his nominee for Supreme Court justice. In chemistry, a litmus test determines if a substance is acidic or alkaline. Metaphorically, as used here, it would determine exactly how a judicial candidate stands on one particular issue. Moster is a former litigation attorney in the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush presidential administrations who currently has offices in Lubbock and Amarillo, and Arnold is the George Killiam Professor of Law at Texas Tech School of Law.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLubbock Avalanche-Journalen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.lubbockonline.com/article/20160416/OPINION/304169895
dc.subjectSupreme Court nomineeen_US
dc.subjectConflict of interesten_US
dc.subjectJudicial nominationsen_US
dc.subjectAppointments clauseen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionen_US
dc.subjectJudicial propensityen_US
dc.titleIt’s Debatable: Should Justices Fit Litmus Test?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record