• English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • English 
    • English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • Login
View Item 
  •   TTU DSpace Home
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • View Item
  •   TTU DSpace Home
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

How Much Evidence Is Needed to Establish the Foundation for the Use of the Co-conspirators’ Exception to the Hearsay Rule?

Thumbnail
View/Open
17_2TexTechLRev121(1970-1971).pdf (392.7Kb)
Date
1970
Author
Squyres, B. Newal, Jr.
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This article looks to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals case White v. State. In White, a co-conspirator’s out-of-court statements were used against defendant White through the co-conspirator’s exception to the hearsay rule. The only evidence of this conspiracy was the statement itself. On this basis, the court reversed the trial court’s conviction of White. This established the co-conspirator’s hearsay exception foundation requirement, stating that there must be evidence of a conspiracy that is independent of the potential hearsay evidence. The author questions, what is the standard for this independent evidence?
Citable Link
http://hdl.handle.net/2346/74564
Collections
  • Texas Tech Law Review

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV