Show simple item record

dc.creatorHines, Steve
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T21:11:08Z
dc.date.available2018-09-19T21:11:08Z
dc.date.issued1972
dc.identifier.citation3 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 401en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/74609
dc.description.abstractDiscusses the three traditional rules for boycotting and hiring temporary employees. The author looks at the development of a fourth rule and whether the fourth rule is a logical extension of the previous rules. Ultimately, after balancing the interest of not interfering with the worker’s right to protest and the employer’s right to protect and continue his business, the author concludes that an employer cannot continue his business by hiring temporary employees during a bargaining lockout.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectEmployee bargaining lockouten_US
dc.subjectTemporary employeesen_US
dc.subjectNational Labor Relations Boarden_US
dc.subjectNLRBen_US
dc.subjectUnionsen_US
dc.subjectInland Trucking Co. v. NLRBen_US
dc.subjectCase noteen_US
dc.titleAn Employer Cannot Continue Business Operations by Hiring Temporary Employees During a Bargaining Lockouten_US
dc.title.alternative: Labor Law – An Employer Cannot Continue Business Operations by Hiring Temporary Employees During a Bargaining Lockouten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record