Burden Shifts to Plaintiff-Opponent of Summary Judgment When Defendant-Movant Has Established an Affirmative Defense as a Matter of Law

Date

1974

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Texas Tech Law Review

Abstract

Discusses affirmative defenses and summary judgment. Traditionally, the defendant does not have the burden of disproving plaintiff’s defensive plea when summary judgment raises a fact issue with respect to the plea being using to avoid affirmative defense as a matter of law. The author observes that the current presumption is that any affirmative defense, once proved as a matter of law, would be efficient to shift burden.

Description

Keywords

Cause of action, Burden of proof, Burden shifting, Affirmative defense, Summary judgment, Nichols v. Smith, Case note

Citation

6 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 301