Show simple item record

dc.creatorJohnson, Philip W.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T17:33:38Z
dc.date.available2018-11-14T17:33:38Z
dc.date.issued1974
dc.identifier.citation6 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/82203
dc.description.abstractFocuses on the doctrine of last clear chance by looking at its origin and the justification of such law. Should the doctrine of last clear change be affected by the adoption of comparative negligence in Texas? The author concludes that discovered peril should no longer be available as a theory of recovery in Texas negligence actions because its purpose has disappeared.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectDoctrine of last clear chanceen_US
dc.subjectDiscovered perilen_US
dc.subjectComparative negligenceen_US
dc.subjectContributory negligenceen_US
dc.titleThe Doctrine of Last Clear Chance – Should It Survive the Adoption of Comparative Negligence in Texas?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record