• English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • español 
    • English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • Login
Ver ítem 
  •   TTU DSpace Principal
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • Ver ítem
  •   TTU DSpace Principal
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A Child's Contributory Negligence Bars a Parent's Recovery For Medical Expenses in Texas

Thumbnail
Ver/
48_8TE~1.PDF (539.6Kb)
Fecha
1977
Autor
Glenn, D. Woody
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Resumen
On May 17, 1972, Richard Dartez was swimming in the Southside Place Park Association pool. An acquaintance of Richard's, Glen Gadbois, was throwing berries toward Richard. Richard in turn would retrieve the berries and throw them back at Glen. During this activity, as Richard swam toward one of the berries, Glen threw another that struck Richard in one eye. Because of the injuries received to that eye, blindness ensued, and surgery was required to remove the injured eye. As a result of this injury, Mr. Dartez sued, as next friend, Southside Place Park Association (defendant) for negligently causing his son's injuries. Mr. Dartez also sued in his own behalf to recover medical expenses incurred in treating Richard's injury. The defendant answered with allegations that Richard was contributorily negligent. In addition, the defendant impleaded Glen alleging that Glen's negligence was the proximate cause of Richard's injury. At the conclusion of the trial, the court submitted an issue to the jury asking them to determine whose negligence was the proximate cause of Richard's injury. The jury responded that Richard, Glen and the defendant were all guilty of negligence contributing to Richard's injury. Based on this finding of Richard's contributory negligence, the trial court thereafter ordered a take nothing judgment against Richard's father, both on his suit for Richard's injuries and his own action for medical expenses. On appeal, the take nothing judgment was affirmed by the Texas Court of Civil Appeals.
Citable Link
https://hdl.handle.net/2346/83552
Colecciones
  • Texas Tech Law Review

Ítems relacionados

Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autor o materia.

  • So How Do You Hold This Thing Again?: Why the Texas Supreme Court Should Turn the Safety Off the Negligent Entrustment of a Firearm Cause of Action 

    Fisher, Jefferson (Texas Tech Law Review, 2013)
    Explores the complexities of a claim for negligent entrustment of a firearm. Part II reviews the history of negligent entrustment of a chattel and highlights the claim's role in society. Part III explores the wide application ...
  • The Tort Liability of Insane Persons for Negligence: A Critique 

    Casto, William R. (1972)
    In this law review comment, the author proposes the thesis that insane persons should not be held to the reasonable man standard in negligence actions. The article begins with background history of negligence and contributory ...
  • Negligence, Breach of Contract, and the “Economic Loss” Rule 

    Powers, William, Jr.; Niver, Margaret (Texas Tech Law Review, 1992)
    Focuses on the “economic loss” rule and its status in Texas. The article also addresses Scharrenbeck and its progeny. It also looks at DeLanney and suggests a form of analysis for future cases. While this article does not ...

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contacto
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Listar

Todo DSpaceComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasDepartmentEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasDepartment

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contacto
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV