Show simple item record

dc.creatorBenham, Dustin B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-26T16:01:39Z
dc.date.available2019-08-26T16:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.citation82 Tex. B.J. 168en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/85082
dc.description.abstractProvides a quick overview of how an attorney can persuade a court to provide a client direct access to an opponent’s electronic devices during discovery. The article first give a brief overview of the current environment for electronic discovery and then examines the Shipman case. The author then provides some pointers on how an attorney can request direct access to electronic devices. Some points to consider include; scope of the direct access order, looking at the efforts and technical capacity of the responding party and their employees and agents, can you prove the likely existence of the documents, and finally is there evidence that the direct access protocol will succeed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Bar Journalen_US
dc.subjectE-discoveryen_US
dc.subjectIn re Marion Shipmanen_US
dc.subjectIn re Weekley Homesen_US
dc.subjectDirect accessen_US
dc.subjectElectronic discoveryen_US
dc.titleE-Discovery: Direct Access of Electronic Devices After In re Marion Shipmanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record