• English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • English 
    • English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • Login
View Item 
  •   TTU DSpace Home
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • View Item
  •   TTU DSpace Home
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

California Abolishes an Allen Charge That Encourages a Juror to Consider Majority Opinion in Forming Individual Views on an Issue, Implies That a Case Wil Have to be Retired if the Jury Fails to Agree, or Refers to the Expense or Inconvenience of the Trial

Thumbnail
View/Open
43_9TE~1.PDF (818.7Kb)
Date
1978
Author
Bundren, Charles
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Examines the California Supreme Court’s case People v. Gainer. The court in Gainer held that the trial court erred when giving the jury the Allen charge; which it held was an improper instruction. An Allen charge is an instruction “that either encourages a juror to consider numerical division or majority opinion in forming individual views on an issue, implies that a case will have to be retried if the jury fails to reach a verdict, or refers to the expense or inconvenience of the trial.” The author believes this decision is in line with the current trend of eliminating or modifying the use of the Allen charge.
Citable Link
https://hdl.handle.net/2346/85096
Collections
  • Texas Tech Law Review

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV