Show simple item record

dc.creatorDuncan, Mandi
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-18T20:58:40Z
dc.date.available2020-02-18T20:58:40Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citation9 Tex. Tech. Admin. L.J. 315en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/85634
dc.description.abstractOutlines the background of TOMA and explains the current state of the law in Texas. This article also examines Ranga v. Brown—where challengers claimed TOMA was unconstitutionally vague, overbroad, and violated the First Amendment. It samples various open meetings acts from California, Illinois, Kansas, and Utah. Finally, it provides possible revisions for the TOMA, and it requests that those revisions include specific violation examples. The author urges that modifying TOMA would prevent future violations and unfettered prosecutor discretion.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Journal of Texas Administrative Lawen_US
dc.subjectAdministrative lawen_US
dc.subjectTexas Open Meetings Acten_US
dc.subjectTOMA
dc.subjectRanga v. Brown
dc.titleThe Texas Open Meetings Act: In Need of Modification or All Systems Go?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record