Show simple item record

dc.creatorLeonard, Jeffrey A.
dc.creatorWoody, Darren G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T20:57:25Z
dc.date.available2020-03-04T20:57:25Z
dc.date.issued1984
dc.identifier.citation15 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 673en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/85705
dc.description.abstractThe intricacies of mechanic's and materialman's liens are a constant source of confusion for Texas courts and attorneys. The most troublesome aspect of Texas mechanic's lien law involves priority contests. The most harmful result of the uncertainty existing in this area of Texas property law is that lenders, original contractors, subcontractors, and developers do not know how to protect their varied interests. Resolution of this uncertainty is of paramount importance to all segments of the construction industry. This article attempts to provide an overview of Texas mechanic's and materialman's lien law and to focus specifically on the scope of the preferential lien on removable improvements.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectMechanic liensen_US
dc.subjectMaterialman liensen_US
dc.subjectPreferential lienen_US
dc.subjectRemovable improvementsen_US
dc.subjectLien lawen_US
dc.subjectRelation back doctrineen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional liensen_US
dc.subjectStatutory liensen_US
dc.subjectBlaylock testen_US
dc.subjectMaterial injuryen_US
dc.subjectRichard H. Sikes, Inc. v. L & N Consultants, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectKaspar v. Cockrell-Riggins Lighting Co.en_US
dc.subjectL & N Consultants, Inc. v. Sikesen_US
dc.titleTexas Mechanic’s and Materialman’s Liens and the Scope of the Preferential Lien on Removablesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record