Show simple item record

dc.creatorReavley, Thomas M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T20:13:24Z
dc.date.available2020-07-07T20:13:24Z
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.citation19 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1393en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/86100
dc.description.abstractFifth Circuit Judge Thomas Reavley offers his perspective on the disconnect between the public’s perception of lawyers and the myriad rules of personal and professional conduct that govern the profession. The author writes that while these rules are very important, they do not address every moral conundrum a lawyer will face. Paramount to the moral and ethical practice of law in the author’s estimation is the central theme underlying all of these rules: protecting the dignity and respecting the inherent value of every human life.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectLawyersen_US
dc.subjectPublic perceptionen_US
dc.subjectPublic opinionen_US
dc.subjectMoralityen_US
dc.subjectProfessional ethicsen_US
dc.subjectProfessional responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectEthical dutyen_US
dc.titleA Perspective on the Moral Responsibility of Lawyersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record