Show simple item record

dc.creatorLish, Mark E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T18:35:12Z
dc.date.available2020-07-17T18:35:12Z
dc.date.issued1988
dc.identifier.citation19 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1163en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/86238
dc.description.abstractExamines a Texas case involving an insurance company’s refusal to pay the claim of one of its insureds who was struck by an uninsured motorist. The Texas supreme court affirmed the decision of the trial court that the insured’s cause of action was barred by provisions in the Insurance Code, but reversed the ruling that insurers owe no duty of good faith and fair dealing to those whom they insure. The author asserts that this ruling will serve to rectify the disparity in bargaining power between insurers and insureds.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectInsurance lawen_US
dc.subjectContract lawen_US
dc.subjectBreach of contracten_US
dc.subjectInsurance companyen_US
dc.subjectDuty of good faith and fair dealingen_US
dc.subjectUnequal bargaining poweren_US
dc.subjectBad faithen_US
dc.titleInsurers Have a Common Law Duty to Deal Fairly and in Good Faith with Their Insurers: Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 725 S.W.2d 165 (Tex. 1987)en_US
dc.title.alternativeInsurers Have a Common Law Duty to Deal Fairly and in Good Faith with Their Insurers: Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record