• English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • English 
    • English
    • español
    • français
    • Deutsch
  • Login
View Item 
  •   TTU DSpace Home
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • View Item
  •   TTU DSpace Home
  • ScHOLAR – Texas Tech School of Law Digital Repository
  • Texas Tech School of Law Journals
  • Texas Tech Law Review
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Alternative and Inconsistent Theories of Recovery or Defense May Be Submitted in a Single Broad Issue Without Mentioning All the Theories in the Jury Charge: Island Recreational Development Corp. v. Republic of Texas Savings Association, 710 S.W.2d 551 (Tex. 1986)

Thumbnail
View/Open
44_18TexTechLRev1017(1987).pdf (1.256Mb)
Date
1987
Author
Griesel, Christopher
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Discusses the history of special issues and their use in Texas courts. Before the Island case only one special issue could be submitted. The holding in Island is a clear departure from Texas precedent and raises many questions about allowing two inconsistent theories of recovery to be submitted in the same broad issue. Questions how this case should be viewed by the courts.
Citable Link
https://hdl.handle.net/2346/86987
Collections
  • Texas Tech Law Review

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartment

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us
TDL
Theme by 
Atmire NV