Show simple item record

dc.creatorMoore, Kimberly S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T21:12:30Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T21:12:30Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifier.citation22 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 885en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/87444
dc.description.abstractExplores the inconsistencies of scrutinizing expert testimony. The author discusses the evolution and basics of expert testimony. The author also proposes a remedy that can serve as a basis for a solution, which will achieve the level of uniformity the Federal Rules of Evidence were designed to inspire.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectTestimonyen_US
dc.subjectEvidenceen_US
dc.subjectExpertsen_US
dc.subjectExpert testimonyen_US
dc.subjectFederal rules of evidenceen_US
dc.titleExploring the Inconsistencies of Scrutinizing Expert Testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record