Show simple item record

dc.creatorHoeffel, Janet C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T19:07:17Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T19:07:17Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationJanet C. Hoeffel, The Jurisprudence of Death and Youth: Now the Twain Should Meet, 46 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 29 (2013-2014)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/87819
dc.description.abstractArgues that the jurisprudence of juvenile transfer should go a step further down the comparative road paved by the Court and insist that juvenile transfer proceedings be subject to the same scrutiny exercised over capital punishment proceedings. Further advocates that while Eighth Amendment jurisprudence need not be literally incorporated into juvenile transfer proceedings, it should be adopted through the Due Process Clause.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectJuvenile transferen_US
dc.subjectCurrent status of juvenile transfer eligibilityen_US
dc.subjectLessons of death penalty narrowing for juvenile transferen_US
dc.subjectNarrowing juvenile transfer eligibilityen_US
dc.subjectMiller's lessons on individualization for juvenilesen_US
dc.subjectAbolishing mandatory transfer lawsen_US
dc.subjectDiscretionary juvenile transfers: judicialen_US
dc.subjectDiscretionary juvenile transfers: prosecutoren_US
dc.subjectGuided discretion in capital casesen_US
dc.subjectApplying lessons of death to judicial and prosecutorial discretion transfersen_US
dc.titleThe Jurisprudence of Death and Youth: Now the Twain Should Meeten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record