Show simple item record

dc.creatorMarceau, Justin F.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T18:34:56Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T18:34:56Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationJustin F. Marceau, Remedying Pretrial Ineffective Assistance, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 277 (2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88066
dc.description.abstractExplores a particular example of the right-remedy gap in the right to counsel context that has previously evaded scholarly attention-that is, the question of federal constitutional remediation when defense counsel provides incompetent representation resulting in the discovery of inculpatory evidence against the defendant. Although instances of pretrial errors of counsel resulting in the discovery of materially incriminating evidence are numerically rare in the published case law, such cases provide a useful lens for understanding, more generally, the scope and nature of Sixth Amendment remedies in federal court.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectRight to a lawyer who does not affirmatively incriminate the clienten_US
dc.subjectIneffective assistance of counselen_US
dc.subjectSuppression as an adequate but unlikely remedyen_US
dc.subjectDamage action under § 1983 Is an inadequate or unavailable remedyen_US
dc.subjectU.S.C. § 1983en_US
dc.subjectMalpractice action under state tort lawen_US
dc.subjectEquitable reliefen_US
dc.subjectMissouri v. Fryeen_US
dc.subjectLafler v. Cooperen_US
dc.titleRemedying Pretrial Ineffective Assistanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record