Show simple item record

dc.creatorStory, Mark T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T20:20:48Z
dc.date.available2021-10-14T20:20:48Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.citation23 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 261en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88109
dc.description.abstractReviews the significant environmental law cases decided by the Fifth Circuit during the survey period focusing primarily on Riverside Market Development Corp. v. International Building Products, Inc. The article will also discuss briefly three other opinions: Dayton Independent School District v. U.S. Mineral Products Co., Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Yost, and Carr v. Alta Verde Industries, Inc. The Fifth Circuit also decided several other cases in the environmental law area; however, these cases neither break new ground nor address substantive environmental law issues. Therefore, they will not be discussed in this article.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental lawen_US
dc.subjectFifth Circuiten_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.subjectComprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Acten_US
dc.subjectIndividual liability for corporate officers, directors, and shareholdersen_US
dc.subjectRiverside Market Development Corp. v. International Building Products, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectAsbestos removalen_US
dc.subjectDayton Independent School District v. U.S. Mineral Productsen_US
dc.subjectClean Water Acten_US
dc.subjectCivil penaltiesen_US
dc.subjectDischarge of oilen_US
dc.subjectChevron USA, Inc. v. Yosten_US
dc.subjectCitizen’s suitsen_US
dc.subjectTwo-part test for proving ongoing violationen_US
dc.subjectCarr v. Alta Verde Industries, Inc.en_US
dc.titleEnvironmental Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record