Show simple item record

dc.creatorHowell, Richard A.
dc.creatorBeck, Mallory A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T18:22:55Z
dc.date.available2021-10-20T18:22:55Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationRichard A. Howell and Mallory A. Beck, Evidence Law, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 793 (2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88126
dc.description.abstractDuring the period of this survey, July 2011 to June 2012, attorneys adapted to new developments in federal civil procedure law. First, on December 1, 2011, amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence became effective. These amendments were implemented as part of the restyling project that has affected other sets of rules. Second, the Fifth Circuit issued opinions on a number of significant evidence-related issues, including sufficiency of evidence, hearsay, Miranda, the admission of evidence of other acts under Rule 404, and expert testimony.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectAmendments to the Federal Rules of Evidenceen_US
dc.subjectSignificant Firth Circuit opinions on evidence mattersen_US
dc.subjectSufficiency of evidenceen_US
dc.subjectHearsayen_US
dc.subjectMiranda and Rule 404en_US
dc.subjectExpertsen_US
dc.subjectMiranda v. Arizonaen_US
dc.titleEvidence Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record