The Majestic and the Mundane: The Two Creation Stories of the Exclusionary Rule
Abstract
Explores the rhetorical and historical arc of these two competing creation stories. In Part II, we will review the
development of the majestic conception of the exclusionary rule from it inception in Boyd on through its refinement in later cases. Part III will turn to the rise of the "mere evidentiary rule" creation story of the exclusionary rule, where Justice Cardozo stands out as the Justice who provides much of the foundational thinking. The final part traces the juncture at which these two narratives crossed in history-when the majestic conception lost its dominance and the evidentiary rule conception gained preeminence.
Citable Link
https://hdl.handle.net/2346/88788Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Exclusionary Rule as a Remedy
Loewy, Arnold H. (Texas Tech Law Review, 2013)Argues that the Court was correct in concluding that the exclusionary rule is a remedy, rather than a right. The advocates that the Court has been incorrect in its parsimonious use of the exclusionary rule as a remedy in ... -
Reasonable Remedies and (Or?) the Exclusionary Rule
Starr, Kenneth W.; Maness, Audrey L. (Texas Tech Law Review, 2010)Focuses on a very practical question - whether the exclusionary rule is an effective way of enforcing Fourth Amendment values, with the key word being "effective." In other words, and setting aside (for now) the question ... -
The Exclusionary Rule as a Remedy
Loewy, Arnold H. (2014)The United States Supreme Court currently views the exclusionary rule as a remedy instead of an inherent right. This article discusses why the exclusionary rule is not a right and how the exclusionary remedy should work. ...