Batholith tectonics: Formation and deformation of ghost stratigraphy during assembly of the mid-crustal Andalshatten batholith, central Norway
Datum
2013Autor
Anderson, Heather S. (TTU)
Yoshinobu, Aaron S. (TTU)
Nordgulen, Øystein
Chamberlain, Kevin
Metadata
Zur LanganzeigeZusammenfassung
The Andalshatten batholith (322 km2,
>700 km3) is a predominantly granodioritic
high-K, calc-alkaline igneous body that
was assembled in the mid-crust across four
lithologically distinct nappes within the
Helge land Nappe Complex, central Norway.
Extensive vertical and horizontal exposures
of metamorphic screens and xenoliths within
the batholith provide an unparalleled view
of the nature of magma emplacement, host
rock displacement, and batholith assembly,
i.e., batholith tectonics. The mapped intrusion
consists of at least five distinct lithologic
phases, including schlieren-banded
to gneissic granodiorite (11% of batholith
area), coarse-crystalline to K-feldspar megacrystic
granodiorite (69%), amphibole-bearing
diorite (11%), tonalite (2%), and minor
leucogranite. Contacts between phases are
both sharp and/or gradational and are interpreted
to reflect comagmatic behavior over
the duration of crystallization of the phases
separated by a given contact. New chemical
abrasion–thermal ionization mass spectrometry
206Pb/238U zircon weighted mean ages of
442.67 ± 0.14 Ma and 441.53 ± 0.40 Ma for
2 samples of the voluminous megacrystic
granodiorite from disparate localities indicate
distinct periods of zircon crystallization
separated by ~1 Ma; titanite ages for these
samples are 441.30 ± 0.21 Ma and 436.10 ±
2.80 Ma, respectively. No observable contacts
were identified between these two lithologically
similar localities.
Of the mapped intrusion area, ~8%
(>24 km2) comprises screens (kilometer
scale) and xenoliths (subkilometer scale)
of metamorphic rocks that reflect the skeletal
framework of the host rock nappes into
which the granodioritic magmas intruded.
This ghost stratigraphy maintains broad
continuity with host rock lithology and structural
trends. The largest screens show no
evidence of internal, emplacement-related
ductile deformation, but appear to be rigidly
rotated into subparallelism with the western
host rock contact, presumably during subsequent
magma injection into the batholith.
In contrast, xenoliths underwent rotation,
translation, and internal deformation in the
magma. The scale dependence of synmagmatic
deformation of screens and xenoliths is
likely the result of smaller blocks becoming
thermally equilibrated with the surrounding
magma and thus deforming by ductile mechanisms
in a magma with increasing yield
strength due to crystallization.
We interpret the Andalshatten batholith
to have been assembled by at least five spatially
distinct, elongate batches of magma
over a minimum duration 600 ka to 1.7 Ma,
including significant recharge events involving
dioritic magmas. Local space for batholith
assembly was accommodated by brittle
and ductile deformation, including viscous
fl ow of host rocks in a dynamothermal contact
aureole. Viscous flow was facilitated by
reactivation of existing structures (e.g., tightening
of interlimb fold angles), recrystallization,
and penetrative foliation development,
resulting in near-field lateral and downward-directed
displacement of host rocks along the
western margin during batholith expansion
and growth. Emplacement of dioritic magmas
added heat and mass to the growing
reservoir, enabling significant magnitudes of
internal, hypersolidus flow, magmatic foliation
development, mechanical mingling, and
screen deformation. These observations and
data sets are consistent with the hypothesis of
multiple recharge events in a magma chamber
that was partially molten over reasonably
large spatial scales, thereby allowing screens
and xenoliths to be incorporated and displaced
and/or deformed.