Show simple item record

dc.creatorMcGlone, John (TTU)
dc.creatorGuay, Kimberly
dc.creatorGarcia, Arlene (TTU)
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T17:32:46Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T17:32:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationMcGlone J, Guay K, Garcia A. Comparison of Intramuscular or Subcutaneous Injections vs. Castration in Pigs—Impacts on Behavior and Welfare. Animals. 2016; 6(9):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6090052en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani6090052
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/90476
dc.description© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractPhysical castration (PC) is painful and stressful for nursing piglets. One alternative to PC is immunological castration (IC), but the pain and stress of handling associated with injections have not been assessed. The objectives of this study were to measure the pain and distress of subcutaneous (SQ) and intramuscular (IM) injections compared to PC in piglets, and to compare SQ or IM injections in finishing pigs. After farrowing, 3 to 5 d old male piglets were randomly assigned to (control) no handling treatment (NO), sham-handling (SHAM), IM, SQ, or PC. Finishing pigs were assigned to NO, SHAM, IM, or SQ. Behavior was monitored for 1 h prior and 1 h post treatment in each age group. Social, feeding behaviors, and signs of pain were recorded. Finishing pigs treated with SQ injections had higher feeding behaviors pre-treatment than they did post-treatment. Overall, physical castrations caused measurable pain-like behaviors and general behavioral dysregulation at a much higher level than the other treatment groups. SQ and IM injections did not cause either significant behavioral or physiological alterations in piglets. SQ injections caused a decrease in finishing pig feed behaviors post treatment (p = 0.02) and SHAM treated finishing pigs spent significantly more time lying than the other treatment groups. In general IM and SQ injections did not cause any other significant changes in behavior or physiology.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectPigsen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Castrationen_US
dc.subjectImmunocastrationen_US
dc.subjectImmunological Castrationen_US
dc.subjectInjectionen_US
dc.titleComparison of Intramuscular or Subcutaneous Injections vs. Castration in Pigs—Impacts on Behavior and Welfareen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record