Show simple item record

dc.creatorGrodsky, Steven M.
dc.creatorMoorman, Christopher E.
dc.creatorFritts, Sarah R. (TTU)
dc.creatorCastleberry, Steven B.
dc.creatorWigley, T. Bently
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T21:20:13Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T21:20:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationGrodsky SM, Moorman CE, Fritts SR, Castleberry SB, Wigley TB (2016) Breeding, Early-Successional Bird Response to Forest Harvests for Bioenergy. PLoS ONE 11(10): e0165070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165070en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165070
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/90481
dc.description© 2016 Grodsky et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.description.abstractForest regeneration following timber harvest is a principal source of habitat for early-successional birds and characterized by influxes of early-successional vegetation and residual downed woody material. Early-successional birds may use harvest residues for communication, cover, foraging, and nesting. Yet, increased market viability of woody biomass as bioenergy feedstock may intensify harvest residue removal. Our objectives were to: 1) evaluate effects of varying intensities of woody biomass harvest on the early-successional bird community; and (2) document early-successional bird use of harvest residues in regenerating stands. We spot-mapped birds from 15 April– 15 July, 2012–2014, in six woody biomass removal treatments within regenerating stands in North Carolina (n = 4) and Georgia (n = 4), USA. Treatments included clearcut harvest followed by: (1) traditional woody biomass harvest with no specific retention target; (2) 15% retention with harvest residues dispersed; (3) 15% retention with harvest residues clustered; (4) 30% retention with harvest residues dispersed; (5) 30% retention with harvest residues clustered; and (6) no woody biomass harvest (i.e., reference site). We tested for treatment-level effects on breeding bird species diversity and richness, early-successional focal species territory density (combined and individual species), counts of breeding birds detected near, in, or on branches of harvest piles/windrows, counts of breeding bird behaviors, and vegetation composition and structure. Pooled across three breeding seasons, we delineated 536 and 654 territories and detected 2,489 and 4,204 birds in the North Carolina and Georgia treatments, respectively. Woody biomass harvest had limited or short-lived effects on the early-successional, breeding bird community. The successional trajectory of vegetation structure, rather than availability of harvest residues, primarily drove avian use of regenerating stands. However, many breeding bird species used downed wood in addition to vegetation, indicating that harvest residues initially may provide food and cover resources for early-successional birds in regenerating stands prior to vegetation regrowth.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectBirdsen_US
dc.subjectWooden_US
dc.subjectForestsen_US
dc.subjectSpecies Diversityen_US
dc.subjectPinesen_US
dc.subjectForest Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectBioenergy Feedstocken_US
dc.subjectForagingen_US
dc.titleBreeding, Early-Successional Bird Response to Forest Harvests for Bioenergyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record