Arizona’s Medical Malpractice Act Is Not Unconstitutional
Date
1978
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Texas Tech Law Review
Abstract
Discusses the Arizona Supreme Court’s case Eastin v. Broomfield. The court in Eastin upheld as constitutional Arizona’s Medical Malpractice Act, which required in part that a plaintiff go first before a medical liability review panel before being allowed to proceed to trial. The author believes this issue will not be settled until it is reviewed by the United States Supreme Court.
Description
Rights
Availability
Keywords
Medical malpractice, Constitutionality, Review panel, Medical Malpractice Act, Reasonable care, Eastin v. Broomfield, Case note
Citation
9 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 679