“Just the Facts” • The Texas Supreme Court Develops an Objective Test for Predatory Pricing: Caller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communications, Inc. 826 S.W.2d 576 (Tex. 1992)

dc.creatorCrouch, Jeffrey Lee
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T18:11:15Z
dc.date.available2021-10-26T18:11:15Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.description.abstractDiscusses the case, Caller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communications. The case concerns predatory pricing. During the process of appealing the decision, the Texas Supreme Court revised the existing approaches for defining predatory pricing. This article discusses previous approaches to predatory pricing and alternative approaches to evaluating predatory pricing.en_US
dc.identifier.citation23 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1119en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88146
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectCaller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communicationsen_US
dc.subjectPredatory pricingen_US
dc.subjectAntitrust lawen_US
dc.subjectConclusive presumptionen_US
dc.subjectRebuttable presumptionen_US
dc.subjectQuasi-conclusive presumptionen_US
dc.subjectTexas Antitrust Acten_US
dc.subjectTexas Free Enterprise Acten_US
dc.title“Just the Facts” • The Texas Supreme Court Develops an Objective Test for Predatory Pricing: Caller-Times Publishing Co. v. Triad Communications, Inc. 826 S.W.2d 576 (Tex. 1992)en_US
dc.title.alternative“Just the Facts” • The Texas Supreme Court Develops an Objective Test for Predatory Pricingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
48_23TexTechLRev1119(1992).pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: