Property Provisions of the Operating Agreement—Interpretation, Validity, and Enforceability
dc.creator | Conine, Gary B. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-17T19:13:14Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-17T19:13:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1988 | |
dc.description.abstract | Examines the rise of “operating agreements” in the joint operation of mineral properties and the correlative upsurge in litigation involving such agreements. These instruments are a complex and highly interrelated web of property provisions which the author asserts have increased flexibility and fiduciary responsibility in the transfer and disposition of property interests. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 19 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1263 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2346/86245 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Texas Tech Law Review | en_US |
dc.subject | Oil and gas law | en_US |
dc.subject | Oil and gas lease | en_US |
dc.subject | Mineral estates | en_US |
dc.subject | Joint operations | en_US |
dc.subject | Operating agreement | en_US |
dc.subject | Implied reciprocal transfers | en_US |
dc.subject | Waiver of partition | en_US |
dc.title | Property Provisions of the Operating Agreement—Interpretation, Validity, and Enforceability | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |