The Supreme Court, Confessions, and Judicial Schizophrenia
Date
2007
Authors
Loewy, Arnold H.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
San Diego Law Review
Abstract
Schizophrenia literally means “split mind.” Consequently, it should not be too surprising that the United States Supreme Court, which is a theoretically continuing body with nine ever-changing minds, would say things in one year that seem schizophrenic when contrasted with last year’s jurisprudence. Unfortunately, many of the inconsistent statements remain good law, and the result largely depends on which doctrine the Court chooses to trot out.
Professor Loewy examines four such statements as well as the extent that each should be taken seriously.
Description
Rights
Availability
Keywords
Accusations, Interrogation, Confession, United States Supreme Court
Citation
44 San Diego L. Rev. 427