The Supreme Court, Confessions, and Judicial Schizophrenia

Date

2007

Authors

Loewy, Arnold H.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

San Diego Law Review

Abstract

Schizophrenia literally means “split mind.” Consequently, it should not be too surprising that the United States Supreme Court, which is a theoretically continuing body with nine ever-changing minds, would say things in one year that seem schizophrenic when contrasted with last year’s jurisprudence. Unfortunately, many of the inconsistent statements remain good law, and the result largely depends on which doctrine the Court chooses to trot out.

Professor Loewy examines four such statements as well as the extent that each should be taken seriously.

Description

Rights

Availability

Keywords

Accusations, Interrogation, Confession, United States Supreme Court

Citation

44 San Diego L. Rev. 427