Constitutional Law-Equal Protection-Utah Statute Setting Different Ages of Majority for Males and Females Is Unconstitutional. Stanton v. Stanton, 421 U.S. 7 (1975)

Date

1975

Authors

Huffman, Walter B.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This article analyzes the seminal Supreme Court decision in Stanton v. Stanton, in which the Supreme Court struck down a Utah law that distinguished the age of majority for men and for women. The article explains the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Stanton, specifically its reliance on the precedent established in Reed v. Reed.

Description

Rights

Availability

Keywords

Constitutional law, equal protection, divorce, men, women, Utah

Citation

Walter B. Huffman, Constitutional Law-Equal Protection-Utah Statute Setting Different Ages of Majority for Males and Females Is Unconstitutional. Stanton v. Stanton, 421 U.S. 7 (1975)., 7 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 161 (1975-1976).