To Bar Plaintiff’s Recovery in Strict Liability, Conduct After the Discovery of a Defect Must Amount Only to a Voluntary Encounter of the Risk

Simple item page
dc.creatorBaskind, Stephen L.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-27T20:36:51Z
dc.date.available2018-11-27T20:36:51Z
dc.date.issued1975
dc.description.abstractObserves the problems that arise when defendants use assumption of the risk as a defense in cases where it was reasonable for the plaintiff to continue to use the product. By adopting the version of the defense of assumption of the risk that entirely excludes the element of reasonableness, the Henderson court unreasonably has limited that protection. The author contends that the courts should abolish the term assumption of risk and merely determine whether plaintiff is barred from recovery.en_US
dc.identifier.citation6 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1211en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/82283
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectTortsen_US
dc.subjectStrict liabilityen_US
dc.subjectAssumption of the risken_US
dc.subjectDefenseen_US
dc.subjectHenderson v. Ford Motor Co.en_US
dc.subjectCase noteen_US
dc.titleTo Bar Plaintiff’s Recovery in Strict Liability, Conduct After the Discovery of a Defect Must Amount Only to a Voluntary Encounter of the Risken_US
dc.title.alternativeTorts – Strict Liability – To Bar Plaintiff’s Recovery in Strict Liability, Conduct After the Discovery of a Defect Must Amount Only to a Voluntary Encounter of the Risken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
76_6TexTechLRev1211(1974-1975).pdf
Size:
479.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Texas Tech Law Review