Plaintiff’s Negligent Conduct Will Not be a Defense in a Strict Product Liability Action When Plaintiff Fails to Discover or Guard Against the Defective Product: Keen v. Ashot Ashkelon, Ltd., 748 S.W.2d 91 (Tex. 1988)

Date

1989

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Texas Tech Law Review

Abstract

Daryel Keen sued Ashot Ashkelon, Ltd. on a strict product liability theory, alleging that Ashot manufactured a defective sand shoe, which was used on a loaded trailer that Strick Corporation manufactured and assembled. Keen was injured due to the defective sand shoe and by contributory negligence. On appeal, the Texas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's judgment, disregarding the jury's finding of Keen's contributory negligence, and held that the nature of Keen's negligence was a failure to guard against a defective product, which cannot be used as a defense to reduce the amount of damages in a strict product liability action.

Description

Rights

Rights Availability

Keywords

Keen v. Ashot Ashkelon, Ltd., Cause of action, Strict product liability, Liability, Contributory negligence, Defective product

Citation

20 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 969