Attack Decisions: Expanding the Aperture of Accountability

In this article, the author examines the legal and ethical dimensions of decision-making processes in the context of military and security operations. The article argues for a broader framework of accountability that addresses not only the immediate actions but also the strategic and policy decisions influencing attacks. By analyzing recent case law and operational examples, the author highlights gaps in current accountability mechanisms and proposes enhancements to ensure greater oversight and responsibility. The discussion emphasizes the need for transparency and ethical considerations in decision-making to align actions with international norms and standards. This article contributes to the ongoing debate about improving accountability in military and security contexts.