When Does a Retroactive Decrease in the Frequency of Parole Reconsideration Hearings Violate the Ex Post Facto Clause?
Date
2000
Authors
Van Cleave, Rachel A.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases
Abstract
Professor Van Cleave previews Garner v. Jones, a Georgia, which raises the issue of whether the retroactive decrease in the frequency of parole reconsideration hearings violate the ex post facto clause of the Constitution? Garner v. Jones is found at 529 U.S. 244.
Description
Rights
Rights Availability
Keywords
Parole reconsideration hearings, Ex Post Facto Clause
Citation
1999-2000 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 191