When Does a Retroactive Decrease in the Frequency of Parole Reconsideration Hearings Violate the Ex Post Facto Clause?

Date

2000

Authors

Van Cleave, Rachel A.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases

Abstract

Professor Van Cleave previews Garner v. Jones, a Georgia, which raises the issue of whether the retroactive decrease in the frequency of parole reconsideration hearings violate the ex post facto clause of the Constitution? Garner v. Jones is found at 529 U.S. 244.

Description

Rights

Rights Availability

Keywords

Parole reconsideration hearings, Ex Post Facto Clause

Citation

1999-2000 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 191