Concerns and Recommendations for Pain and Masculinity Research using Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Cautionary Tale

dc.contributor.committeeChairPiña-Watson, Brandy
dc.contributor.committeeChairKim, Shin Ye
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLittlefield, Andrew
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMurphy, Michael
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGaros, Sheila
dc.creatorDaheim, Jacob
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-20T20:34:57Z
dc.date.available2023-11-20T20:34:57Z
dc.date.issued2023-08
dc.description.abstractThe goal of research is to discover and disseminate truth. The journey toward this goal can be complex as researchers are faced with decisions throughout the research process. In the field of psychology, errors during this process are prevalent which has contributed to the concerning replication crisis and cast doubt on the credibility of psychological research. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a widely used online platform in psychology for collecting data, has contradictory evidence regarding its quality, which may be a significant factor in the propagation of errors. The quality of data collected through MTurk is significantly impacted by the strategies used to screen and clean data. To help researchers produce credible research, a cautionary tale is provided describing the potential consequences of adhering to the current standard of practice when collecting data through MTurk and the importance of examining data quality. The cautionary tale begins with a description of a theoretically grounded study in masculinity and pain that is argued to have compelling implications if examined effectively. The tale takes an unexpected and unfortunate turn as it is found that no matter how compelling or theoretically sound, poor research methods (e.g., data cleaning strategies) or poor-quality data can derail such a study and produce inaccurate results. The tale highlights flaws with the current standard of practice when collecting data through MTurk, analytical tools employed to identify the quality of the data as poor, the flawed results that could have been detected, and the problematic interpretations that might have been disseminated as well as recommendations for future research. The study highlights the complexity of the entire research process and the necessity for rigorous research practices to help ensure the effective discovery and dissemination of the truth in the field of psychology, particularly in masculinity and pain research using MTurk.
dc.format.mimetypeApplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/96842
dc.language.isoen
dc.rights.availabilityAccess is not restricted.
dc.subjectData cleaning
dc.subjectOpioid abuse
dc.subjectPain self-efficacy
dc.subjectMasculine gender norms
dc.subjectChronic pain
dc.titleConcerns and Recommendations for Pain and Masculinity Research using Amazon Mechanical Turk: A Cautionary Tale
dc.typeDissertation
thesis.degree.departmentPsychologial Sciences
thesis.degree.disciplineCounseling Psychology
thesis.degree.grantorTexas Tech University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DAHEIM-DISSERTATION-2023.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: