A Driver’s Refusal to Submit to a Blood Alcohol Test is Admissible as Evidence at Trial

Date

1984

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Texas Tech Law Review

Abstract

In 1983, the United States Supreme Court held that individuals who refuse to submit to a blood alcohol test may have that refusal admitted as evidence against them at trial. This reversed the Supreme Court of South Dakota’s decision, affirming the circuit court, which held that the law allowing for this evidence to be admitted against the accused violated the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. This article reviews the development of the government’s power to compel a blood alcohol test and question whether such legislative measures will reduce roadway fatalities.

Description

Rights

Availability

Keywords

Drunk driving, Intoxication, Blood alcohol test, Evidence, Fifth amendment, Self-incrimination, South Dakota v. Neville, Case note

Citation

15 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 969