Confrontation and Forensic Laboratory Reports, Round Four

Simple item page
dc.creatorFriedman, Richard D.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-04T18:09:29Z
dc.date.available2021-10-04T18:09:29Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractAnalyzes how Crawford v. Washington radically transformed the doctrine governing the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution.'en_US
dc.identifier.citationRichard D. Friedman, Confrontation and Forensic Laboratory Reports, Round Four, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 51 (2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/87978
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectAnalysis of the arguments favoring admissibilityen_US
dc.subjectTestimonial statementen_US
dc.subjectPrimary purpose to accuse a targeted individualen_US
dc.subjectFormalityen_US
dc.subjectTruth of what is asserteden_US
dc.subjectSufficiently conveyeden_US
dc.subjectSupport of the expert's opinionen_US
dc.subjectPlausible alternative explanationen_US
dc.subjectCost considerationsen_US
dc.titleConfrontation and Forensic Laboratory Reports, Round Fouren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
06_45TexTechLRev51(2012-2013).pdf
Size:
1.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Texas Tech Law Review