A Nonviable Fetus May Recover for Personal Injuries

dc.creatorHurd, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-19T21:05:19Z
dc.date.available2018-09-19T21:05:19Z
dc.date.issued1971
dc.description.abstractDiscusses whether or not damages are available for prenatal injuries. The author compares the viability theory to the conception theory. The author explains how some Courts disagree with both theories and believe that a cause of action exists without distinguishing the stage of development of the fetus.en_US
dc.identifier.citation3 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 189en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/74607
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectCause of actionen_US
dc.subjectFetusen_US
dc.subjectConception Theoryen_US
dc.subjectViability Theoryen_US
dc.subjectPrenatal injuriesen_US
dc.subjectDelgado v. Yandellen_US
dc.subjectCase noteen_US
dc.titleA Nonviable Fetus May Recover for Personal Injuriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeInfants – Prenatal Injuries – A Nonviable Fetus May Recover for Personal Injuriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
17_3TexTechLRev189(1971-1972).pdf
Size:
226.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: