The Future of Effective Assistance of Counsel: Rereading Cronic and Strickland in Light of Padilla, Frye, and Lafler

dc.creatorMyers II, Richard E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T15:42:35Z
dc.date.available2021-10-14T15:42:35Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractTwo cases decided in March of 2012, Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, when read in conjunction with Padilla v. Kentucky from 2010, suggest that there is significantly more room for judicial intervention in the relationship between defense counsel and the defendant under the guise of the Sixth Amendment than previously thought. These cases, taken together, squarely place the courts in the business of regulating the attorney-client advising relationship, including advice regarding whether or not to accept a plea or go to trial; the forecasts of the risks associated with going to trial and counsel's estimate of the likelihood of conviction; and the potential collateral consequences of conviction.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRichard E. Myers II, The Future of Effective Assistance of Counsel: Rereading Cronic and Strickland in Light of Padilla, Frye, and Lafler, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 299 (2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88098
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectGideon v. Wainwrighten_US
dc.subjectStrickland v. Washingtonen_US
dc.subjectPadilla v. Kentuckyen_US
dc.subjectMissouri v. Fryeen_US
dc.subjectLafler v. Cooperen_US
dc.subjectAdversarialismen_US
dc.titleThe Future of Effective Assistance of Counsel: Rereading Cronic and Strickland in Light of Padilla, Frye, and Lafleren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13_45TexTechLRev229(2012-2013).pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: