Confrontation Control

dc.creatorMetzger, Pamela R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-04T18:13:42Z
dc.date.available2021-10-04T18:13:42Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractExplains how the artificial fundamental rights doctrine has ceded confrontation control to counsel. Then, considers and critique the jurisprudence addressing defendant claims about confrontation rights that were waived or forfeited by defense counsel. Along the way, offers some observations about the implications of ceding confrontation control to counsel. Concludes by arguing that the right to confrontation best serves its purposes when defendants control the exercise of the right.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPamela R. Metzger, Confrontation Control, 45 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 83 (2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/87979
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectConsidering confrontationen_US
dc.subjectConfrontation: purpose and practiceen_US
dc.subjectConfrontation as a non-fundamental righten_US
dc.subjectAnalyzing confrontation deprivationsen_US
dc.subjectStrickland analysisen_US
dc.subjectStrickland-hybrid analysisen_US
dc.subjectCritiquing the Control Confrontation Ruleen_US
dc.titleConfrontation Controlen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
07_45TexTechLRev83(2012-2013).pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: