Exploring the Inconsistencies of Scrutinizing Expert Testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence

dc.creatorMoore, Kimberly S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-29T21:12:30Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29T21:12:30Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.description.abstractExplores the inconsistencies of scrutinizing expert testimony. The author discusses the evolution and basics of expert testimony. The author also proposes a remedy that can serve as a basis for a solution, which will achieve the level of uniformity the Federal Rules of Evidence were designed to inspire.en_US
dc.identifier.citation22 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 885en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/87444
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectTestimonyen_US
dc.subjectEvidenceen_US
dc.subjectExpertsen_US
dc.subjectExpert testimonyen_US
dc.subjectFederal rules of evidenceen_US
dc.titleExploring the Inconsistencies of Scrutinizing Expert Testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
37_22TexTechLRev885(1991).pdf
Size:
972.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: