James Iredell and the American Origins of Judicial Law Review

dc.contributor.authorCasto, William R.
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T16:24:51Z
dc.date.available2010-04-09T16:24:51Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.description.abstractProfessor Casto provides a look at the earlier writings of James Iredell. Especially fascinating is that Iredell developed his ideas in the 1780s without the assistance of pre-existing analyses of judicial review. His ideas accurately foreshadowed virtually all subsequent judicial discussions of the issue in the early Republic. No justice of the Supreme Court -including Chief Justice Marshall - has ever addressed the issue in a more comprehensive and sophisticated fashion. Iredell's explanation and justification also virtually dictated the fundamental rule of judicial interpretation that the early justices used in gauging the constitutionality of legislation.en_US
dc.identifier.citation27 Conn. L. Rev. 329en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10601/469
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherConnecticut Law Review
dc.relation.urihttp://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/conlr27&collection=journals&id=339&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.urihttps://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/3S3T-V9P0-00CV-T0NH-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.urihttps://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/I5850602123ef11dbbab99dfb880c57ae/View/FullText.html
dc.subjectJames Iredellen_US
dc.subjectJudicial reviewen_US
dc.subjectJudicial interpretation
dc.subjectConstitution
dc.titleJames Iredell and the American Origins of Judicial Law Reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
casto2.pdf
Size:
1.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: