Random metaphylaxis effects on health outcomes, complete blood count, antimicrobial use, and growth performance of high-risk beef steers

Abstract

Objective: Our objectives were to evaluate the effects of random metaphylaxis administered at feedlot arrival to 0, 33, 66, or 100% of high-risk beef cattle on clinical health, growth performance, complete blood cell counts, and antimicrobial use during a 35-d receiving period. Materials and Methods: Crossbred beef steers (n = 216; arrival BW = 197 ± 6.4 kg) were used in a general- ized complete block design consisting of 2 source blocks, each with 4 BW blocks, and 4 treatments. Experimen- tal treatments and steers were randomly assigned to pen within source block: (1) negative control, s.c. injection with sterile saline (0M); (2) 33% of steers per pen giv- en metaphylaxis at random with tildipirosin (33M); (3) 66% of steers per pen given metaphylaxis at random with tildipirosin (66M); and (4) positive control; conventional metaphylaxis given to 100% of steers with tildipirosin (100M). Body weight and blood samples for quantification of complete blood count were collected on d 0, 14, and 35. Metaphylactic treatment was included in the model as a fixed effect, and BW block within source block was included as a random effect. Results and Discussion: The percentage of steers treated with an antimicrobial for bovine respiratory dis- ease once was greater (P < 0.01) for 0M and 33M than for 66M and 100M. Neither BW on d 35 nor ADG from d 0 to 35 differed among treatments (P ≥ 0.65), but DMI and DMI as a percentage of BW from d 0 to 35 was greater (P ≤ 0.03) for 66M and 100M than for 0M and 33M. No dif- ferences in hematological variables were detected among treatments (P ≥ 0.19), whereas most complete blood count variables were affected by day (P < 0.01). Most notably, the neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio was greater (P < 0.01) on d 0 than on d 14 and 35. Implications and Applications: These data suggest that arrival metaphylaxis can be randomly administered to 66% of cattle without increasing bovine respiratory dis- ease morbidity, while simultaneously increasing DMI simi- lar to conventional metaphylaxis. Random metaphylaxis to 66% of steers at arrival decreased antimicrobial use for metaphylaxis while simultaneously maintaining health outcomes and growth performance of high-risk beef cattle.

Description

© 2023, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Rights

Availability

Keywords

antimicrobial use, cattle morbidity, receiving cattle study

Citation

Hanratty, A.N., Sanchez, N.C.B., Broadway, P.R., Carroll, J.A., Hoffman, A.A., Manahan, J.L., McDaniel, Z.S., Smock, T.M., Dornbach, C.W., Line, D.J., Theurer, M.E., Galyean, M.L., & Hales, K.E.. 2023. Random metaphylaxis effects on health outcomes, complete blood count, antimicrobial use, and growth performance of high-risk beef steers*. Applied Animal Science, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2023-02458

Collections