The Temporary Cessation Doctrine: A Practical Response to an Ideological Dilemma

dc.contributor.authorKramer, Bruce M.
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-14T17:07:46Z
dc.date.available2010-04-14T17:07:46Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.description.abstractThis article will explore the historical development of the fee simple determinable rule, its subsequent application to activities in the secondary term and the difficult doctrinal fit between the concept of temporary cessation of production and the rule. The primary emphasis will be on Texas cases, but comparisons with other jurisdictions and their treatment of the temporary cessation doctrine will be made. In addition, cases involving defeasible term interest will also be explored since Texas courts have essentially treated the leasehold habendum clause and the similar defeasible term deed granting clause the same.en_US
dc.identifier.citation43 Baylor L. Rev. 519en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10601/573
dc.publisherBaylor Law Review
dc.relation.urihttp://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/baylr43&collection=journals&id=547&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.urihttps://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/Iee65d6215cbc11dbbe1cf2d29fe2afe6/View/FullText.html
dc.subjectFee simple determinable ruleen_US
dc.subjectTemporary cessation of productionen_US
dc.subjectTemporary cessation doctrineen_US
dc.titleThe Temporary Cessation Doctrine: A Practical Response to an Ideological Dilemmaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
kramer6.pdf
Size:
1.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.73 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: