Reducing the Frequency and Impact of Procedural Challenges to Adopted Rules: The Legislature’s Direct Effort to Squeeze Out the Need for Court Interpretation of the APA

Simple item page
dc.creatorPruett, Kimberly
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T15:13:14Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T15:13:14Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the amendment to the Texas Administrative Procedure Acts that adds a provision for courts to remand a rule to an agency if the agency has not substantially complied with the rule adoption procedural requirements. The article discusses two cases in which agencies were affected by the new rule. Lastly, the article points out that the new provision gives the courts less judiciary interpretation and the APA greater power by reducing the frequency and impact of procedural challenges to adopted rules.en_US
dc.description.noteOriginal journal title: Texas Tech Journal of Texas Administrative Law.
dc.identifier.citation1 Tex. Tech J. Tex. Admin. L. 103en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2346/73300
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Journal of Texas Administrative Lawen_US
dc.subjectJudicial interpretationen_US
dc.subjectRemanden_US
dc.subjectRule adoptionen_US
dc.subjectAPAen_US
dc.subjectRulemakingen_US
dc.subjectTexasen_US
dc.subjectTexas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. Accord Agriculture Incorporateden_US
dc.subjectLower Laguna Madre Foundation, Inc. v. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commissionen_US
dc.subjectAdministrative Procedure Acten_US
dc.titleReducing the Frequency and Impact of Procedural Challenges to Adopted Rules: The Legislature’s Direct Effort to Squeeze Out the Need for Court Interpretation of the APAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

Texas Tech Administrative Law Journal