Reasonable Remedies and (Or?) the Exclusionary Rule

dc.creatorStarr, Kenneth W.
dc.creatorManess, Audrey L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-13T18:32:38Z
dc.date.available2022-01-13T18:32:38Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractFocuses on a very practical question - whether the exclusionary rule is an effective way of enforcing Fourth Amendment values, with the key word being "effective." In other words, and setting aside (for now) the question of what values the Fourth Amendment is meant to advance, the question is: How do we vindicate those values and, perhaps more importantly, do we do it well? Argues that the chosen method for vindication, the exclusionary rule, is by design famously under-inclusive.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKenneth W Starr and Audrey L. Maness. Reasonable Remedies and (Or?) the Exclusionary Rule, 43 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 373 (2010-2011)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2346/88762
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTexas Tech Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectFourth Amendmenten_US
dc.subjectExclusionary ruleen_US
dc.subjectSupreme Court's decisions limiting the application of the exclusionary ruleen_US
dc.subjectIncreased litigationen_US
dc.subjectFirst Amendment valuesen_US
dc.titleReasonable Remedies and (Or?) the Exclusionary Ruleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
15_43TexTechLRev373(2010-2011).pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: